Economic diplomacy

Stay up to date!

Subscribe to Economic Diplomacy Updates and stay up to date with upcoming events, new publications and research, and Diplo courses and training on economic diplomacy.

In 2021, the Australian government secured its digital borders by backing the purchase of a telecommunications giant. By helping Telstra buy Digicel Pacific, the largest mobile network in the South Pacific, Australia kept a critical piece of regional infrastructure in allied hands, directly preventing a sale to Chinese investors. This calculated act of economic diplomacy demonstrated how a state can deploy financial capital to achieve strategic security goals.

Definition

Economic diplomacy is central to modern statecraft, facilitating the movement of resources and wealth across borders to strengthen a nation’s global integration. It integrates a country’s financial assets with its international relations to advance national interests, with the objective of attracting and retaining investments and protecting economic stability. In contrast to traditional diplomacy, which often centres on peace treaties or political alliances, economic diplomacy positions the marketplace as the primary arena for global influence.

What makes economic diplomacy unique is its dual nature: it uses political influence to achieve economic ends, such as opening a new market for farmers, and economic tools to achieve political ends, such as using a trade agreement to strengthen a military alliance.

It operates on the principle that a nation’s power connects directly to its wealth and its ability to provide or withhold financial benefits. By managing these exchanges, states can reward allies with better trade terms or pressure rivals through restrictions.

Relevance

In a system where global supply chains link every continent, economic diplomacy acts as a primary tool for maintaining national security. A strong military must operate alongside reliable access to energy, food, and high-tech components to keep a nation secure. When a country negotiates a deal for lithium or semiconductors, it practices a form of statecraft that keeps its factories running and its citizens employed.

From a political perspective, economic diplomacy enables states to project power without resorting to armed conflict. Offering low-interest loans or constructing infrastructure in developing countries can foster diplomatic support and secure favorable votes in international organizations such as the United Nations. Conversely, the capacity to freeze assets or restrict access to global banking systems provides non-violent means to penalize aggression or deter hostile actions.

The economic impact of economic diplomacy is substantial. By reducing tariffs and harmonizing regulations, diplomats establish a predictable environment conducive to business growth. Such stability attracts foreign investment, which in turn promotes job creation and technological advancement. In the context of global competition, diplomatic efforts abroad can have direct effects on domestic employment and industry.

Methods and approaches

Governments employ a range of practical instruments to conduct economic diplomacy, spanning from cooperative engagement to assertive measures. The most common methods include:
  • Trade negotiations: Diplomats spend years hammering out free trade agreements (FTAs) that remove barriers, such as taxes on imported goods. These deals make it cheaper for companies to sell their products abroad and help lower prices for consumers at home.
  • Trade missions: High-ranking officials, often accompanied by business leaders, travel to foreign countries to showcase their national industries. These missions serve as government-backed sales pitches, helping domestic firms secure contracts with foreign partners.
  • Economic promotion and branding: Embassies work to improve their country’s image as a brand. They host events to promote their national wine, tech startups, or tourism destinations to attract international spending.
  • Economic sanctions and incentives: Governments use the carrot-and-stick approach. A state might offer aid or debt relief to encourage a country to adopt certain policies, or apply sanctions to stop trade with a nation that violates international laws.
  • Lobbying and advocacy: Economic diplomats constantly engage with foreign regulators to ensure that laws in other countries do not unfairly disadvantage their homegrown businesses.

Geographical scope

Economic diplomacy happens everywhere, from quiet office meetings to massive international summits. In bilateral relations, two countries work together to solve specific trade issues, such as a disagreement over car exports or agricultural standards.

At the regional level, countries join forces to form large economic blocs. Organisations such as the European Union (EU) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) allow members to pool their resources and negotiate as a single, more powerful unit.

Multilateral forums serve as the global stages for these discussions. At the World Trade Organisation (WTO), nearly every country meets to set the rules for international trade. Similarly, the G20 and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) provide spaces where the world’s largest economies coordinate their financial policies to prevent global crises.

Finally, informal venues like the World Economic Forum in Davos allow leaders and CEOs to build relationships that often lead to official government deals later.

Historical development

The roots of economic diplomacy are as old as trade itself. Ancient routes like the Silk Road served as diplomatic pathways where empires exchanged gifts and built alliances.

However, the modern version took a clearer shape in the 19th century. A major turning point was the 1860 Cobden-Chevalier Treaty between Britain and France, which proved that lowering trade barriers could lead to peace and prosperity between old rivals.

The period following World War II was the most transformative era. In 1944, the Bretton Woods Conference established the IMF and the World Bank, creating a new system to manage the global economy. This shift moved the focus from simply avoiding war to actively managing global finance to keep economies stable.

In the 1990s, the end of the Cold War led to a period of massive global integration. The creation of the WTO in 1995 and the signing of North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994 showed that countries were betting their futures on open markets.

More recently, the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic shifted the focus again. Today, the emphasis has moved from making trade cheaper to making supply chains more secure and resilient, a strategy often referred to as friend-shoring.

Actors

The actors in economic diplomacy extend well beyond traditional state representatives.

  • National governments: Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Departments of Trade lead the way. They set the strategy and negotiate the big deals.

  • Corporations: Multinational companies are major participants. They facilitate the actual trade and investment that diplomats try to promote, and they advise governments on which rules would help them grow.

  • International Organisations: The WTO, World Bank, and IMF act as the referees, setting the rules and providing the playing field for global economic interactions.

  • Non-State actors: NGOs and think tanks influence the conversation by advocating for fair trade, environmental standards, or labour rights. They ensure that economic deals consider social impacts alongside profit.

  • Expert communities: Economists and lawyers provide the technical data needed to draft complex treaties and resolve trade disputes.

Examples

The U.S. Chips and Science Act (2022)

In an effort to reduce dependence on foreign manufacturing, the United States passed the Chips and Science Act. This policy provides billions of dollars in subsidies to encourage high-tech companies to build semiconductor factories within the U.S. and its allied nations.

By using financial incentives to move supply chains away from competitors, the U.S. uses its economic power to secure its technological future. This exemplifies industrial diplomacy, in which the state directs private investment to advance national security goals.

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) (2013)

The BRI remains one of the largest economic diplomacy projects in history. China has spent hundreds of billions of dollars building railways, ports, and bridges across Asia, Africa, and Europe. While these projects help developing nations grow, they create deep diplomatic ties and give China significant influence over global trade routes.

In 2017, when Sri Lanka could not repay its loans on the Hambantota Port, it handed over control of the port to China for 99 years, illustrating how infrastructure debt can lead to long-term political advantage.

The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (2020)

Following Brexit, the United Kingdom and the European Union had to rewrite their entire economic relationship. The resulting agreement was a massive feat of diplomacy that covered everything from fishing rights to data sharing.

It allowed for tariff-free trade in goods, preventing a total economic collapse between the two partners. This example shows how diplomacy creates a new legal framework that allows two neighbours to continue doing business despite their political split.

Tailor your subscription to your interests, from updates on the dynamic world of digital diplomacy to the latest trends in AI.

Subscribe to more Diplo and Geneva Internet Platform newsletters!